-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:11:35PM -0700, Jason R. Mastaler wrote: >Kyle Hasselbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Come to think of it, 'round these parts, MUAs don't do that--they >> expect to have an MTA that does it for them. > >MTAs don't handle adding hashcash tokens to e-mail; at least at this >point in time.
What I meant was that the MUA expects an MTA to queue. On a desktop, we assume there's a server, and we have to queue if we can't reach it. Outlook has an outgoing queue, for instance. On a server, there's queueing software already there (sendmail), and the MUA expects it will just throw a message at the MTA, and the MTA will queue. Since my MTA doesn't have hashcash functionality, and my MUA doesn't have queue functionality, I've made this intermediary that does both. The MUA considers it an MTA, and the MTA considers it a MUA. Of course, if I had a faster computer, there'd be much less incentive to do all this. 8-) - -- KKyyllee HHaasssseellbbaacchheerr || CChheecckk yyoouurr dduupplleexx kkyyllee@@ttooeehhoolldd..ccoomm || sswwiittcchh.. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFASe/W10sofiqUxIQRAryiAJ0VS3gjUhk8NL3A0qVZfbsfe42TWwCXdKPf R93PbYA4ohaAUB3tuAEI7A== =F5kL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
