On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 08:25:50PM +0000, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:56:26PM +0000, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > > The best thing rather than messing around with a union or long might be > > to make the closure for the choose callback a struct which has the stuff > > to identify session and window and client, then each command just uses > > whichever of those it likes. > > I wanted to do that, but IIRC that would mean a change of return value from > window_choose_add() which is then a change in API from other commands which > use this (find-window, for instance.) Are you saying this impact is OK? It > would make it easier to do it there, IMO. >
Yeah its fine to change find-window etc as well if necessary > Thanks for the other comments, I'll look into those in a moment and see what > I can come up with for round two. > > -- Thomas Adam > > -- > "It was the cruelest game I've ever played and it's played inside my head." > -- "Hush The Warmth", Gorky's Zygotic Mynci. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
