On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Bob Hutchinson wrote: > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Martin Waschbuesch wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have the following trouble: > > > > I have prepared the toaster for domainkeys and set the DNS accordingly. > > (The DNS entries have been verified using > > http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html > > and > > http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/selectorcheck.html > > Since they tell me the information is valid, I assume the problem does > > come from the server side.) > > > > When I send mail now, they do get signed. At least, a header like the > > following is being added: > > > > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; > > d=waschbuesch.de; > > b=A6ptw22RSLRbPUFVMF7JiCEAqADLgdv2Uze3zpbNpnrTaC28Ppj8lAb3eHf/nink ; > > > > Now, all the sites that I used to test, claim that they cannot find > > the DNS name. > > Yahoo! and the ESPC (email provider service coalition) tests both claim: > > > > "DomainKey-Status: no key: Caught error looking up key: DNS name not > > found" > > # dnsqr any aschbuesch.de > 255 aschbuesch.de: > 83 bytes, 1+0+1+0 records, response, nxdomain > query: 255 aschbuesch.de > authority: de 7200 SOA f.nic.de ops.denic.de 2008082093 7200 7200 3600000 > 7200 > > I can't find it either
ooops oh yes it does dnsqr any waschbuesch.de 255 waschbuesch.de: 285 bytes, 1+6+2+3 records, response, noerror query: 255 waschbuesch.de answer: waschbuesch.de 240 A 80.254.139.85 answer: waschbuesch.de 240 MX 10 rumo.waschbuesch.de answer: waschbuesch.de 240 16 \035v=spf1\040ip4:80.254.139.85\040-all answer: waschbuesch.de 240 SOA ns1.all-connect.net hostmaster.all-connect.net 2008082002 10800 1800 2419200 240 answer: waschbuesch.de 240 NS ns1.all-connect.net answer: waschbuesch.de 240 NS ns3.all-connect.net authority: waschbuesch.de 240 NS ns1.all-connect.net authority: waschbuesch.de 240 NS ns3.all-connect.net additional: rumo.waschbuesch.de 240 A 80.254.139.85 additional: ns1.all-connect.net 142890 A 80.254.130.4 additional: ns3.all-connect.net 142890 A 80.254.140.9 > > > What is wrong? Does anyone have an idea? > > > > Any help, advice, etc. is highly appreciated! > > > > Thanks, > > > > Martin > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.