Bug report #325 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: <http://znutar.cortexity.com:8888/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/325> REPORT #325 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: webbug State: received Priority: high Severity: serious Confidence: public Environment: Release: tomcat 3.1 JVM Release: sun1.3.0-C Operating System: win98 OS Release: fe Platform: win32 Synopsis: Apache + Tomcat bad link handling Description: I ran Tomcat standalone and it works fine. On the other hand, Tomcat configured as an add-on to Apache (who serves the static files), with the .dll module loaded has this behaviour: When I access /testj/hello it works fine with a test servlet. When I acces /testj/index.html which has a link in it to /testj/hello I receive a 404 HTTP error. The same servlet works fine if I put it in the /examples context. So, if it would have been me, I think it shouldn't work at all, therefor I report it as a bug.Title: BugRat Report # 325
BugRat Report # 325
| Project: Tomcat | Release: tomcat 3.1 |
| Category: Bug Report | SubCategory: New Bug Report |
| Class: webbug | State: received |
| Priority: high | Severity: serious |
|
Confidence:
public
|
Submitter:
_Anonymous ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Date Submitted:
Nov 1 2000, 09:33:38 CST
Responsible:
Z_Tomcat Alias ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
- Synopsis:
- Apache + Tomcat bad link handling
- Environment: (jvm, os, osrel, platform)
- sun1.3.0-C, win98, fe, win32
- Additional Environment Description:
- I set up Tomcat with several contexts: - those provided by default (in %TOMCAT%/webapps); - my test context c:\www\testj apjmounted as /testj.
- Report Description:
- I ran Tomcat standalone and it works fine. On the other hand, Tomcat configured as an add-on to Apache (who serves the static files), with the .dll module loaded has this behaviour: When I access /testj/hello it works fine with a test servlet. When I acces /testj/index.html which has a link in it to /testj/hello I receive a 404 HTTP error. The same servlet works fine if I put it in the /examples context. So, if it would have been me, I think it shouldn't work at all, therefor I report it as a bug.
- How To Reproduce:
- null
- Workaround:
- null
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
