BugReport 748 came in this morning. I'm up to my eyeballs at work lately so
I haven't been able to look at it in depth, but it does look like a real
spec violation so it probably should be considered for 3.2.2.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hans
> Bergsten
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 2:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.2.2 [Was: Re: BugRat Report #690 has been filed.]
>
>
> Hans Bergsten wrote:
> >
> > "Ignacio J. Ortega" wrote:
> > >
> > > Hola Hans , Marc:
> > >
> > > You are using 3.2 from CVS???? AFAIK i did apply a patch 2 oe 3 weeks
> > > ago , that seems to resolve this problem, were reports #619
> #653 #513 ,
> > > and i think this is resolved in CVS, please review it and i
> will revise
> > > BugRat to close related bugs , if you agree it's already resolved..
> >
> > I was using the 3.2.1 version, not the latest CVS version (duh!).
> > Will test again with the CVS version.
>
> Okay, I have tested with the latest tomcat_32 version from CVS
> now and it works as it should. So the patch you applied solved
> the problem. Thanks for telling me before I spent time trying to
> solve this again ;-)
>
> Great, then I don't know of any serious issues that should hold up
> a 3.2.2 release.
>
> Hans
> --
> Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gefion Software http://www.gefionsoftware.com
> Author of JavaServer Pages (O'Reilly), http://TheJSPBook.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
