on 1/12/01 11:52 PM, "David Weinrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In diving through the documentation I found for log4j, and hitting the
> website I noticed...it is now part of the jakarta project (yay!). Seems like
> this would be a (much much much) better idea than my mostly-untested syslog
> code for an addition to the logger classes, any thoughts on this?
>
> David Weinrich
+1. Use log4j.
-jon
--
Honk if you love peace and quiet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
