Christopher K. St. John wrote:
> > All I'm saying is that it's dangerous to rely on behavior > > that's not clearly defined by the spec, > > > But give me a break: what JServ is doing in this case > is just fantastically counterintiutive. I agree with Chris on this.
> This probably needs to be summarized and sent as
> spec feedback, but unless he says otherwise I will > assume Gokul Singh is going to do it (Gokul?) I think the specs do need to clarify this matter. So I think I am going to
summarize it and send it to spec feedback.
Regds,
Gokul
> > -cks > |
- Re: Session passivation (was... Kief Morris
- one session for many web sit... Mihai Popoaei
- Re: one session for many web... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: one session for many web... cmanolache
- Re: one session for many web... Mihai Popoaei
- Re: NullPointerException from HttpSessionFacade.invali... Gokul Singh
- Re: NullPointerException from HttpSessionFacade.i... Hans Bergsten
- Re: NullPointerException from HttpSessionFaca... Gokul Singh
- Re: NullPointerException from HttpSession... Hans Bergsten
- Re: NullPointerException from HttpSessionFacade.i... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: NullPointerException from HttpSessionFacade.invali... Gokul Singh
- Re: NullPointerException from HttpSessionFacade.invali... Greg Brouelette