on 3/3/01 6:55 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> on 3/2/01 11:58 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> For "real" production servers I hope you'll use Apache, and for embeding
>>> tomcat in apps or development you don't need 500 requests per seconde.
>>
>> What if we need 500 requests per second for non-static files? :-)
>
> You got them already - tomcat overhead for serving servlets is comparable
> with apache overhead for serving static pages.
>
> Everything else is up to the servlet implementation.
>
> ( actually, tomcat overhead is smaller than Apache 1.3, but
> Apache 2.0 is faster )
>
> Costin
what platform/os? i believe your previous claims have been on NT, is this
also for unix now as well?
-jon
--
If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
<http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/> && <http://java.apache.org/turbine/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
