On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Casey Lucas wrote:

> 
> 
> Casey Lucas wrote:
> > 
> > Just curious... why did you take out the buffer size double?  Is that too
> > much memory to sacrifice?  Someone ? recently sent this in as a performance
> > improvement patch.

Ops :-) 

No, there is no problem with doubling the size, the fix was to match the 
new buffer size with bufSize - and I guess I picked the first value
and changed the second.

I'll revert to double size ( in both places ).

Costin

Reply via email to