On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > Where? This didn't work until I modified ResourceFactory to take care of
> > it, copying the way that the default resource factory for a DataSource is
> > set up.
>
> You can set parameters for a resource (ejb-ref, resource-ref, and the
> others) with :
>
> If the resource is jdbc/TestDB, the parameters are defined with :
> <ResourceParams name="jdbc/TestDB">
>
> <parameter><name>factory</name><value>factory_class_name</value></parameter>
> <parameter><name>user</name><value>sa</value></parameter>
> <parameter><name>password</name><value></value></parameter>
> <parameter><name>driverClassName</name>
> <value>org.hsql.jdbcDriver</value></parameter>
> <parameter><name>driverName</name>
> <value>jdbc:HypersonicSQL:database</value></parameter>
> </ResourceParams>
>
Oh, OK. We should probably write up some simple docs on this.
Because javax.mail.Session is a standard J2EE resource type, I'm going to
go ahead and leave it defaulting to the factory I just created, so users
don't have to remember that.
I presume that a user-supplied factory would need to be visible to the
Catalina class loader, right?
> Note the factory parameter.
>
> > Also, I noticed one other thing that I'm about to fix. The entries for
> > resources, EJB references, and so on are getting created in the
> > "java:com" context. According to the J2EE spec, they are supposed to be
> > in the "java:comp/env" context (along with environment entries). It's a
> > real simple patch, to be submitted shortly after I double check that it
> > works correctly.
>
> Yes, I made a mistake. I can fix it.
>
See next CVS commit.
> Remy
>
>
Craig
