Hi,

I take a look at pushlet and find it very bad design.

Using opened http connections to do real-time job is
not realist.

In that case you keep an :

- one OS (job/thread)
- one ajp13 connection
- one tomcat thread.

Imagine if you got > 256 concurrents connexions !

A better alternative will be to use a custom made network
protocol.

BTW, I'll see where the problem could be in mod_jk ;-)


"Entre truands, les bénéfices, ça se partage, la réclusion, ça
s'additionne."
-- Michel Audiard
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jestin Jean-Francois 
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 5:34 PM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: apache 1.3.12 and tomcat 3.3-m2 connection problem ??
>
>
>here are 2 articles speaking about the pushlet
>
>http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-03-2000/jw-03-pushlet.html
>
>http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-03-2000/jw-03-pushlet-2.html
>
>here is a very simple sample pushlet :
>
>
>import javax.servlet.*;
>import javax.servlet.http.*;
>import java.io.*;
>
>public class SimplePushlet extends HttpServlet
>{
>    public void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, 
>HttpServletResponse response)  throws ServletException, IOException {
>
>        ObjectOutputStream out = new ObjectOutputStream 
>(response.getOutputStream());
>        response.setContentType("text/plain");   
>        
>        String start = "Http connection opened";
>        
>        out.write(start.getBytes());
>        out.flush();
>   
>        try {
>            for (int cnt=1; cnt > 0; cnt++) {
>                Thread.sleep(1000);
>                
>                String iter = "event=" + cnt + "\n";
>                out.write(iter.getBytes());
>                out.flush();
>                System.out.println("event=" + cnt + "pushed.\n");
>            }
>        } catch (Exception e) {
>            System.out.println("error:"+e);
>        }
>        
>        out.close();
>    }
>}
>
>You may use netscape as browser or ie if you don't care about 
>waiting 15 pushes.
>
>Thank you for your help.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Jestin Jean-Francois 
>> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> >Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 4:01 PM
>> >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 
>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>> >Subject: apache 1.3.12 and tomcat 3.3-m2 connection problem ??
>> >
>> >
>> >Hello,
>> >
>> >I'm currently using apache 1.3.12(mod_jk) and tomcat 3.3-m2 
>> >under solaris 2.6 talking ajp13
>> >
>> >Everything works fine except that I encounter sometime an 
>> >Internal Server Error if I don't restart Apache each time I 
>> >restart tomcat. Is there a fix for that problem ?
>> >
>> >On the other hand I use a server push mechanism (called 
>> >pushlet) - that's why I use milestone build of 3.3 (not 
>> >working under 3.2.1)- it works also fine (what a beautiful 
>> >life !) except that sometime (!!??) the servlet (pushlet) 
>> >doesn't detect the end of the connection (Browser killed) 
>> >between tomcat and apache
>> >
>> >looking at the mod_jk log gives the following :
>> >
>> >[jk_ajp13_worker.c (325)]: Error ajp13_process_callback - 
>write failed
>> >[jk_ajp13_worker.c (325)]: Error ajp13_process_callback - 
>write failed
>> >[jk_ajp13_worker.c (325)]: Error ajp13_process_callback - 
>write failed
>> >[jk_ajp13_worker.c (203)]: connection_tcp_get_message: Error - 
>> >jk_tcp_socket_recvfull failed
>> >[jk_ajp13_worker.c (623)]: Error reading request
>> >[jk_ajp13_worker.c (203)]: connection_tcp_get_message: Error - 
>> >jk_tcp_socket_recvfull failed
>> >[jk_ajp13_worker.c (623)]: Error reading request
>> >[jk_ajp13_worker.c (325)]: Error ajp13_process_callback - 
>write failed
>> >[jk_ajp13_worker.c (325)]: Error ajp13_process_callback - 
>write failed
>> >[jk_ajp13_worker.c (325)]: Error ajp13_process_callback - 
>write failed
>> >[jk_ajp13_worker.c (325)]: Error ajp13_process_callback - 
>write failed
>> >[jk_ajp13_worker.c (325)]: Error ajp13_process_callback - 
>write failed
>> >
>> >Is there also a fix for that or these problems ?
>> >
>> >Thank you very for your answer and your great job !
>> >
>> >
>> >****************************************************
>> >Jean-Fran> çois JESTIN
>> >****************************************************
>> >
>> >
>> >
>

Reply via email to