>> >actually, i think i might prefer something like mod_ajp and 
>ajp_.  if
>> >jtc means jakarta-tomcat-connector, that might be a little too
>> >generic.
>> >what do you call the next connector protocal?
>> 
>> and ajp = Apache Jakarta Protocol (which not much clear)
>> 
>
>so, do you envision one native library and one set of connectors (for
>apache, iis, etc.) that support all connector protocols?  if so, then
>mod_jtc and jtc_ make more sense to me.

The original goal is to provide support for Apache1.3/2.0/IIS/NES/JNI 
using for example ajp12/ajp13/ajp14. But there is also a JNI mode
used for example by IBM to link their apache to their websphere.

jtc seems less related to just ajp....

Reply via email to