>jean-frederic clere at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> I am sorry... I should have complained before in APR... Now
>it is a bit too
>> late.
>>
>> We really should use a common tool in ASF when possible, if
>the tool is
>> DOXYGEN
>> we will have to use DOXYGEN.
>
>Seeing it a little bit in deep, DOXYGEN is not a good thing...
>It just works better than ScanDOC (the parsing engine is WAY better), but
>it's a lame-ass program...
So will we use DOXYGEN or keep Scandoc ?
>The only thing I'd need to do it in Java would be a C source
>parser, and then I could stick it into StyleBook/2, but so far,
>I haven't been able to figure out how JavaCC works...
I take a look at SourceForge :
http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_of_search=soft&exact=1&words=documentati
on+generator
A matching project was EJAD (http://sourceforge.net/projects/ejad/) but I
didn't see
any release. I contacted the developpers.
