On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 08:56:45AM -0400, Keith Wannamaker wrote: > I am concerned that the loss of original escaping > will break somebody. For instance: As Costin pointed out, the escaping of a URI does not change its semantics - they should be treated as identical by anyone who follows the URI spec. Escaping where it wasn't escaped *shouldn't* break anyone. And, the whole question is what does Tomcat see the request as? I could make a case that it should never know about the unparsed_uri, but only the uri that httpd finally resolved to and that mod_jk picked up. -- justin
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix cmanolache
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Justin Erenkrantz
- RE: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Keith Wannamaker
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix cmanolache
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix David Rees
- RE: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Keith Wannamaker
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix David Rees
- RE: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Keith Wannamaker
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix cmanolache
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Bill Barker
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix cmanolache
- Fw: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Bill Barker
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix David Rees
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix cmanolache
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix cmanolache
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Bill Barker
- Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Bill Barker
- RE: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix GOMEZ Henri