"Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:52:50AM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>> Since there is no official release of httpd-2.0, I am confident that nobody
>> will actually care unless they're testing something... And by "testing" good
>> practice says "get the HEAD of CVS and try it out yourself if it doesn't
>> work". Development happens on "head" and if someone forks off for a little
>> while to do some porting to some weird operating systems, at the end those
>> changes will have to be integrated with HEAD, so, there's no point in
>> sticking with backward compatibility AT THIS POINT.
>
> +1 to what Pier said. (Ryan may chip in here too...)
Yeah, I would like to hear what he thinks...
> If you are using anything other than HEAD for httpd-2.0, I don't
> care much about any bug reports you may have. The odds are that it'd
> either be fixed or broken in a different manner. =)
You would have not better explained my thoughts in a better way...
> -- justin
Who I respect so much after he committed that patch to get rid of MM un APR
land, and saved me at least 2 headaches :) :) :) :)
Pier
