> 
> You're right ... d'oh! I assumed that a method called 
> "digest" returned 
> a digest. I guess I should not assume so often =)
> 
> My bad ... but in some slight manor of defense, that method call is 
> poorly named :)
> 

We can change it to a more apropiate "digestedOrNot"  

:))))

Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega

Reply via email to