on 10/22/01 10:48 AM, "Paul Speed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Only partially related to the bug, so I'm replying directly instead
> of through bugzilla...
> 
> Does this mean that JSP uses a different Java language specification?
> If so, where can I find this separate specification?  Are there any
> other big things like this that are incompatible with normal Java
> syntax?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Paul Speed

This is yet another great reason why you shouldn't embed Java code within
your templates. JSP != Java

-jon

Reply via email to