on 10/22/01 10:48 AM, "Paul Speed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only partially related to the bug, so I'm replying directly instead > of through bugzilla... > > Does this mean that JSP uses a different Java language specification? > If so, where can I find this separate specification? Are there any > other big things like this that are incompatible with normal Java > syntax? > > Thanks, > -Paul Speed This is yet another great reason why you shouldn't embed Java code within your templates. JSP != Java -jon