jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Eric Rescorla wrote: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > One simple workaround could be to abstract acceptSocket() too ( i.e. make > > > it a method in ServerSocketFactory or SSLSupport). > > Yes, we could do that. It's a little ugly but it avoids having a wrapper > > class around ServerSocket so I suppose it's worthwhile. > > Does implAccept play something there? I don't think so. The problem is that we're using the native ServerSocket of the SSL implementation so we need to wrap that call.
-Ekr -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
