Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Deacon Marcus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:42 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Tomcat4, taglibs, and pageContext.include
>
>
> Hi,
> I need to upgrade to latest T4 ASAP, and I need to have my tags working...
> ;/
> So, I guess I must get source and recompile after downgrading a
> few files -
> could you please recommend what files exactly I need to "downgrade" and to
> what versions to get rid of the mentioned "feature"?
> And, maybe the problem's worth a paragraph or two (plus links to
> downloadable patch) in FAQ?
Would it be enough to change:
public void include(String relativeUrlPath)
throws ServletException, IOException
{
JspRuntimeLibrary.include((HttpServletRequest) request,
(HttpServletResponse) response,
// FROM:
relativeUrlPath, out, true);
// TO:
relativeUrlPath, out, false);
/*
String path = getAbsolutePathRelativeToContext(relativeUrlPath);
context.getRequestDispatcher(path).include(
request, new ServletResponseWrapperInclude(response, out));
*/
}
In org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl ?
Greetings, deacon Marcus
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rickard �berg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 4:14 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Tomcat4, taglibs, and pageContext.include
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Due to some recent subtle changes in Tomcat (Jasper and servlet API to
> > be precise) it is no longer possible to implement jsp:include tags. This
> > now results in the infamous "May not flush in custom tags" (or similar)
> > error message.
> >
> > Two questions:
> > * Why was this change made? (It is likely to break any include-tag ever
> > written)
> > * How is one supposed to write such tags now? I found some code in
> > Tomcat4 suggesting one should use RequestDispatcher.include along with a
> > response wrapper that provides the JspWriter on getWriter, but it seems
> > hackish (and won't work well with 2.2 servlet engines).
> >
> > Any explanations would be appreciated. I believe it was Craig who
> > committed these changes.
> >
> > /Rickard
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
