Sounds very good to me. Thanks. Bojan
Larry Isaacs wrote: > I still plan to release the jakarta-tomcat HEAD as 3.3.1. > 3.3a will be the original 3.3 source with just enough changes > to avoid the DOS problem. This is for those who require > a "validated" version of Tomcat 3.3 and can't just switch > to a new version. Hopefully the minimal changes will make > it feasible for them to update. I also plan to mention on the > site that for those who can switch, the nightly 3.3.x would be > as stable and more bug free than the current, or patched, > Tomcat 3.3. > > It has been a requirement that Tomcat 3.x be able to run > under JDK1.1.8. If we keep this requirement, the HEAD > of jakarta-tomcat isn't releasable at the moment. I haven't > tried to track this down yet, but I assume it won't be a problem > to file. It's little issues like this that I don't routinely test that > make me reluctant to try to release the HEAD right away. > > Cheers, > Larry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wed 1/9/2002 10:45 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Cc: > Subject: Re: Dealing with the Tomcat 3.3 "aux.jsp" DOS problem and a Tomca t 3. 3.1 >release > > > > Larry Isaacs wrote: > > > >>Since it won't be possible to fetch the "patched 3.3" from >>CVS using a tag or branch, I'm reluctant to give it a normal >>version number. "3.3a" seems like a reasonable alternative. >>I'll provide full tar.gzs and zips in addition to jars to update >>an existing Tomcat 3.3 installation. >> > > > So, the 3.3a will be 'current Tomcat 3.3 HEAD from CVS, but released as > 3.3a'. Right? > > Bojan > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
