On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

> > If nobody oposes, I will check in a current build of commons-logging
> > ( with the option to override it for those who like downloading
> > each individual dependency ).
> 
> -0.5. The current property system looks ok to me, and Tomcat itself already
> depends on commons-logging (indirectly), so why do that ? If you want to do
> that because of API stability concerns with commons-logging, then I think
> you should postpone using it until it is a bit more stable.

It's a matter of taste mostly. I can live with the current property 
system, but I prefer the build to be as simple as possible - 
 'checkout the tree and type ant', without downloading other 
packages, installing them, editing properties, etc. 

That's a 'taste' shared by other jakarta projects. I used to believe
it is evil, and I argued a lot against it, but it certainly has
the benefit of beeing more friendly to new contributors, who don't 
spend all day working on jk. 

An alternative is to require the user to checkout both
jakarta-commons, and j-t-c ( and maybe j-t, j-t-4 ), like
we used to do in the old days ( with jakarta-tools ).
I just want an alternative to 'download and install and configure'.

Costin







--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to