+1 for option A and B together (they don't have to be mutually exclusive, and we can examine user behavior to see if binary patches are an idea worth pursuing.
+1 for 4.0.3-b1. Craig On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:09:08 -0800 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [4.0.3] [VOTES] Upcoming release and security fix > > Since there are apparently diverging opinions on the subject (and also since > I didn't get any +1s for a possible 4.0.3 b1, or a 4.0.2a release), here's a > formal request for vote. > > On the security problem reported yesterday, affecting the security manager > sandboxing. We should: > <ballot> > A [ ] Make a full 4.0.3 (or 4.0.2a) release which would only include the > security fix > B [ ] Make the security fix available as a binary patch for 4.0.2 (it would > take the form of an archive to extract in $CATALINA_HOME, and would be > *small*) > C [ ] Accelerate the release schedule of 4.0.3, which would include the > security fix, as well as fixes for other issues with 4.0.2 (with Beta 1 on > 03/01 and Final on 03/08) > </ballot> > > Multiple votes are acceptable. If there are other interesting possibilities, > let me know. > > My vote is 'B'. > > In parallel, I'd like to release a first beta of 4.0.3 on 03/01 (depending > on the vote on item 'C' above, the release cycle may be shorter or longer): > <ballot> > +1 [ ] I support the release, and I will help > +0 [ ] I support the release > -0 [ ] I don't support the release > -1 [ ] I'm against the release because: > > > </ballot> > > My vote is +1. > > Note: Non-committers are welcome to vote if they feel like it, but the vote > in that case is non binding. > > Remy > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
