> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > > Do you think coyote could be ever used with Tomcat 3.3 ? > > ie: works with JDK 1.1, support TC 3.3 via modules.... > > Again: tomcat3.3 _doesn't_ require all modules to support > JDK1.1 ! The only requirement is to have the basic > functionality ( of a servlet container ) working on JDK1.1, > and we already have that. > > There are quite a few optional modules in 3.3 that require > 1.2 - sandbox, thread loader, etc. As long as the > core is JDK1.1 compatible, things are going to be ok.
Anyway, it should be JDK 1.1 compliant. > > JK/JK2 are available for both TC 3.3/4.x, it could be fine to > > have also a common HTTP connector for them and coyote seems > > to be the perfect candidate :) > > Well, we already have 4 HTTP/1.1 connectors for 3.3 :-) I think he meant *JAVA* HTTP/1.1 connectors here. :-) > But I agree it would be good if Coyote would share more with > jk - right now they use the low level stuff, but it would > be trivial to integrate them a bit more and share the > same connector ( the Request impl. - which will require > quite a bit of work to optimize for 4.x ). The request is slightly different at the moment, but that's because I don't know what I need (so sorry, I'm not using your BaseRequest for the first version). The Catalina adapter will be a full reimplementation of the o.a.c.connector package (which has issues), and will use facaded request/response objects. So I'm doing the optimization work for you here. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
