It doesn't work in either case. In this case it should be index.vm, since that's the file that exists in the directory.
Bojan On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 19:58, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > question. > > Should mod_jk forward to tomcat index.jsp or index.vm ? > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_]____ > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 1:11 PM > >To: Tomcat Dev List > >Subject: index.*: mod_jk 1.2.0 vs. Apache 2.0.36 > > > > > >I've submitted a bug regarding this (9913) since it still appears to be > >there in the above combo. > > > >This should be very simple to test (you just whack an index.jsp in a > >directory), so if someone can confirm that my configuration is > >brain-dead (because this is such an unlikely bug :-), that would be > >nice. > > > >Bojan > > > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >For additional commands, e-mail: > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
