>Henri thinks we should discuss that here, so I'm forwarding >the original mail.
Sure that's OSS way ;) >Basically I don't like the time. The alternative is to use something >like GetTickCount(). there is no gettickcount under Unix, but you could use gettickcount on WIN32 if it's faster. >The patch uses the semi-dynamic endpoint cache. One should set the high >enough worker.cachesize, and the number of opened channels will drop >after worker.cache_timeout. Tell use more about worker.cache_timeout. >Since IMO there was the general +1 for Jan's patch, here is >the original >with added endpoint timeout. time_t now = time(NULL); Is there faster alternative in apache ? time() is a consuming call, and I recall hack from a SGI boy to speed Apache 1.3 in avoiding use of time(), which are also in request_rec (r->request_time) in apache 1.3 (time_t) and 2.0 (apr_time_t) >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: 22. lipanj 2002 18:06 >> To: GOMEZ Henri >> Subject: mod_jk cache and socket timeout >> >> >> Hi Henri, >> >> Here is the Jan Singer's socket timeout patch with added >> cache timeout (since its not in the tree already). Still >> don't like the time() difftime, but it'll do. >> >> Added workers.cache_timeout (defaults to 15 secs). >> >> With high cachesize, Apache 2.0.40-dev/TC 4.1.5 XP/WIN2K >> behaves perfectly. Done the test on 4x1.6GHz PIII Xeon and >it flies... >> >> >> Greetings, >> MT. >> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
