Patrick Luby wrote: > Remy, > > > Remy Maucherat wrote: > >> >> I just got a bit lazy after finishing the repackaging in j-s-5, and >> thought I would do it the next day :-D >> > > I don't think it is lazy to put this off. Instead, I think we are all > trying to tackle higher priority issues first. > > Speaking of higher priority issues, I would vote for resolving the > getHeaders() problem since they are causing Watchdog failures. > > Are you and Costin comfortable with Steve Downey's latest proposal > (headers are split on "," for only the headers explicitly defined in the > HTTP/1.1 specification)?
No, doing that for getHeaders would cause problems, as pointed out by Costin. I'm not convinced anymore the test is valid at all, after reading Costin's arguments. Strong -1 on changing the behavior of getHeader, but I could be talked into implementing comma-parsing for getHeaders if you can prove Costin was wrong. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
