Mladen Turk wrote: > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Henri Gomez >> >>Even if I agree with using APR in JK 2.1, I think we should >>first focus on having a stable JK 2.0 before starting >>thinking about JK 2.1. >> > > > That's good one :).
As I said it's premature to discuss what should be in JK 2.1 until JK 2.0 is in a stable state. JK2 will be adopted by users if they saw that it's both stable and as a regular release rate. Many sites won't use JK2 until it became an Apache release, which has allways been a proof of quality. So my recommandation, we'll be to finish JK 2.0, before thinking to JK 2.1 > I agree with that, but would like to make the load balancer to have a > timeout connection-recovery option, cause that's the only way to have > JK2 serve more then 5 concurent connections (depending on the system > performance), and to be 'stable' or even 'usable'. Just don't wish to > write the same thing twice... > > >>Branching now since premature. >> > > > Why? - fixing bugs in 2 branches is a nigthmare. - confusion for users when they'll see a stable 1.2.0, a beta 2.0 and a dev 2.1. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
