DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13081>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13081 ScriptingVariableVisitor#setScriptingVars does not account for scriptlet scopes ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-01 19:46 ------- I do believe the problem stated in 13132 does apply to your situation. Remember 13132 started out with this code fragment: <% if (condition) { %> <i18n:message key="some.key" id="myID"/> <% } else { %> <i18n:message key="some.other.key" id="myID"/> <% } %> which is exactly what you are trying to do. The purpose of the example I gave in the evaluation of 13132 is to show that some developers may rely on AT_END variables to be declared after the call to the tag handler's doEndTag() method, so that a nested tag may declare an AT_END variable of the same name, but with a different type than an AT_END variable declared by the enclosing tag. Would the workaround that I suggested for bug 13132 work for you, i.e., do something like the following: <prefix:outerTag> <% if (true) { %> <prefix:innerTag id="x" /> <% } %> <prefix:innerTag id="y" /> </prefix:outerTag> I am little reluctant adding a configuration property for this, as it would not be portable across containers. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
