jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> 
>> More comments on APR and JK2.
>>
>> While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
>> jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
>> built with JNI support.
>>
>> JNI support in JK2 requires APR.
>>
>> So I build an apr 0.9.1 rpm, which include apr-utils
>> since apr-utils couldn't be built without apr ;-[
>>
>> To avoid conflict with Apache 2.0 rpms, I've installed
>> apr libs in /usr/lib/apr/ and includes in /usr/include/apr.
>>
>> And here we allready discover many interesting things :
>>
>> With Apache 2.0, libapr shared lib in name libapr.so.0.9.2.
>> With APR build, it's called libapr-0.so.0.9.2.
>>
>> What you see also is that is seems that parts of apr-utils
>> are included in Apache2 binaries (ie md5 stuff), so when
>> you're using APR libs, you should add apr and aprutils to
>> ldpath (-lapr -laprutils).
>>
>> With that I was thinking being ready to make Apache 1.3
>> works with APR, for JNI use purposes.
>>
>> I've used :
>>
>> ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --with-jni 
>> --with-apr-lib=/usr/lib/apr --with-apr-include=/usr/include/apr
>>
>> The build works but I saw that the mod_jk2.so was linked against
>> /usr/lib/libapr.so (the one from Apache 2.0 built) against the one
>> in /usr/lib/arp.
>>
>> So I patched Makefile.in to change -lapr to -lapr-0.
>>
>> here correct build and link.
> 
> 
> That is not enough you should use apr-config.
> I have already patched mod_webapp for that.

Could you do the same for jk2, but it should be only if --with-apr
is present...





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to