jean-frederic clere wrote: > Henri Gomez wrote: > >> More comments on APR and JK2. >> >> While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also >> jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2 >> built with JNI support. >> >> JNI support in JK2 requires APR. >> >> So I build an apr 0.9.1 rpm, which include apr-utils >> since apr-utils couldn't be built without apr ;-[ >> >> To avoid conflict with Apache 2.0 rpms, I've installed >> apr libs in /usr/lib/apr/ and includes in /usr/include/apr. >> >> And here we allready discover many interesting things : >> >> With Apache 2.0, libapr shared lib in name libapr.so.0.9.2. >> With APR build, it's called libapr-0.so.0.9.2. >> >> What you see also is that is seems that parts of apr-utils >> are included in Apache2 binaries (ie md5 stuff), so when >> you're using APR libs, you should add apr and aprutils to >> ldpath (-lapr -laprutils). >> >> With that I was thinking being ready to make Apache 1.3 >> works with APR, for JNI use purposes. >> >> I've used : >> >> ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --with-jni >> --with-apr-lib=/usr/lib/apr --with-apr-include=/usr/include/apr >> >> The build works but I saw that the mod_jk2.so was linked against >> /usr/lib/libapr.so (the one from Apache 2.0 built) against the one >> in /usr/lib/arp. >> >> So I patched Makefile.in to change -lapr to -lapr-0. >> >> here correct build and link. > > > That is not enough you should use apr-config. > I have already patched mod_webapp for that.
Could you do the same for jk2, but it should be only if --with-apr is present... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
