jean-frederic clere wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: >> Mladen Turk wrote: >> >> >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>On Behalf Of Costin Manolache >>>> >>>>Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on >>>>why/how :-) ? >>>> >>>> >>> >>>Sure, like everyone else ;). >> >> >> Yes, I know :-) >> >> I'll try to get over the horrible and nonstandard DTD that we >> use > > I agree for not standard DTD but horrible... > Well it needs a lot of improvements but that means the xml files need to > be reviewed carefully I would suggest to output messages when using > "weird" elements to have time to rewrite the files.
:-) Sorry about 'horrible'. What I meant is - the elements like <section> and almost everything else have an identical meaning as the standard XHTML or docbook element. It's a mix of elements - to do something that is already done and standard and accepted. What I find horrible is the fragmentation and missuse of XML ( not only here, but all over ). What's wrong with a subset of XHTML or Docbook ? Do we plan to beat W3C and Oasis in setting a standard for document dtd ? ( well, that's just me ranting - this has little to do with our xdocs, as I said I'll try to get over it and add to them ) -- Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
