Howdy, As this is hopefully nearing a wrap-up vote... >> Right. You need a distribution tailored for your use. Others may have >> slightly different dists they need. Where does it stop? Would we end up >> with 2-3 dozen different distributions? Tomcat can be used in so many >> different ways that it can be very difficult for those devs who vote to >> decide on how many dists there should be and what they should contain.
I agree with that. >I think this is a bad good idea. >That's more or less what the Windows installer does or could do, and >that's good as that's what Windows users expect. Windows users (including myself part of the time) more or less expect crap. They don't mind having to reboot all the time. >However, I doubt Unix people are used to or like installers and similar >technologies. I think so too. And there's the not-insignificant hassle of keeping the installer itself bug-free, well-documented, etc. >Profiles look similar to how well known servers work, so I clearly favor >that solution. Ditto. As a user of JBoss and other servers, I like that. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
