It is on my todo list ( I also need this to work, at least for 500 ). Do you have a patch ?
Costin Donald Ball wrote: > Are any tomcat developers going to express any interest in this issue? I > frankly consider being completely ignored to be quite rude and a poor way > to interact with the at-large developer community. > > - donald > > On 12/19/2002 at 12:13 PM Donald Ball wrote: > >>On 12/19/2002 at 4:02 PM Martin Algesten wrote: >> >>>The problem with this bug is that there are people here who don't agree >>>it is a bug... which is just plain ignorant and stupid... THIS IS A >>>BUG....IT NEEDS FIXING! >> >>Thank you - now I at least know that other people have observed this >>behavior and I'm not merely on crack. Now it remains to show that the >>behavior is incorrect. The 2.3 servlet specification doesn't explicitly >>state that the status code attached to a response handled by an error-page >>element should be the original status code... (Perhaps I should write to >>the servlet spec group working on 2.4 to suggest making this explicit?) >>However, common sense and the HTTP specification both suggest that it > would >>be the right thing to do. If you send a 200 instead of a 404 status code >>along with an html page which says the given resource was not found, > search >>engines, proxy servers, et. al. will not understand that the resource is >>missing. >> >>Hmm. Digging around in the 2.3 spec more deeply, I note the description of >>HttpServletResponse.sendError reads: >> >>"Sends an error response to the client using the specified status clearing >>the buffer. The server defaults to creating the response to look like an >>HTML-formatted server error page containing the specified message, setting >>the content type to "text/html", leaving cookies and other headers >>unmodified. If an error-page declaration has been made for the web >>application corresponding to the status code passed in, it will be served >>back in preference to the suggested msg parameter." >> >>The first sentence clearly states that the response sent to the client > must >>use the specified status code, regardless of whether the content body is >>generated by the server automatically or is read from an error-page >>location. >> >>>I've tried get this one sorted as well... however, either someone will >>>tell you they don't agree it is a bug and/or they will just ignore you >>>until you go away. >> >>I can't accept that. If it's a bug, if it doesn't implement the servlet or >>HTTP specifications properly, it should be fixed. Apache software has >>always been about correctness, security, and speed, in that order. >> >>- donald >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
