> Amy Roh wrote:
> >>Amy Roh wrote:
> >>Yes, but IMO, it's the admin's problem. The admin webapp shouldn't
> >>duplicate the functionality that it present elsewhere. Also, if the
> >>admin wishes to disable access from localhost (and access from
> >>elsewhere), then he has the right to do so.
> >
> >
> > I see your point regarding the admin should let disabling access from
> > localhost if it's accessing from elsewhere.  How about if I remove
checking
> > for localhost and just keep the checking for admin's own ip and host?
>
> That's probably acceptable. It's not worth the complexity IMO, but it's
> up to you.
>
> Ok, go to bed now :) It's way too late for you, so I'm not integrating
> your patches for that tag ;-)

lol. :-D  I don't really care if it's included in *this* tag.  I just wanted
to come to an agreement between usability and "dummy" patience. ;-)  I must
be in european time zone for today.  bonne nuit.  zzzz

Amy
>
> Remy
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to