How is LGPL incompatible? I can understand GPL. Dave.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 March 2003 17:45 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.x Clustering > > incompatible licenses > > Filip > > ~ > Namaste - I bow to the divine in you > ~ > Filip Hanik > Software Architect > www.filip.net > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Oxley, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:53 AM > >To: 'Tomcat Developers List' > >Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.x Clustering > > > > > >Just had a look at it. Not tried it yet, but have a query. Why haven't > you > >used JavaGroups for this? > > > >Dave. > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: 09 March 2003 23:23 > >> To: Tomcat Developers List > >> Subject: Tomcat 4.1.x Clustering > >> > >> okey dokey, a pre taste of what tomcat 5 is going to include, > >> a fully working version of clustering for your Tomcat 4.1.x codebase. > >> I wrote this against 4.1.12, but intend to test it with later versions > as > >> well. Let me know if you beat me to it. > >> > >> http://www.filip.net/tomcat-clustering.html > >> > >> Tomcat 5, will ship with clustering, or at least a module with > clustering > >> :) > >> > >> Filip > >> > >> ~ > >> Namaste - I bow to the divine in you > >> ~ > >> Filip Hanik > >> Software Architect > >> www.filip.net > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> ~ > >> Namaste - I bow to the divine in you > >> ~ > >> Filip Hanik > >> Software Architect > >> www.filip.net > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 9:33 AM > >> >To: Tomcat Developers List > >> >Subject: Re: cvs commit: > >> >jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 > >> >MapperListener.java > >> > > >> > > >> >Costin Manolache wrote: > >> >> Remy Maucherat wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>>costin 2003/03/07 22:52:36 > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Modified: coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 > >> >>>> MapperListener.java > >> >>>> Log: > >> >>>> A Server is not required for non-standalone operation. In > >> >fact, Embeded > >> >>>> doesn't define > >> >>>> a server, and most apps embeding tomcat use this approach. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> All we care is an Engine. > >> >>> > >> >>>Hmm, yes. Well, actually, no. In that junk code (I should have put a > >> >>>fixme), I'm trying to look up the hosts. I was planning to rewrite > the > >> >>>code using JMX and remove the coupling (the only good solution IMO). > >> >>> > >> >>>What do you think ? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> It's even better. > >> >> But you can just look for contexts - using the j2eeType=WebModule to > >> >> do the query ( but you'll have to parse the host and path from > >> >> the name - the spec doesn't define a host attribute ). > >> >> > >> >> What I think is that we should clean up a bit before 5.0 is final - > >> >> we have Embeded which doesn't extend or use Service or Server, and > >> >> is probably used either directly or as a model by people. > >> >> > >> >> Engine is the only stable point ( which makes sense ), we should > >> >deprecate > >> >> and make sure we don't depend too much on Service or Server ( except > >> the > >> >> standalone case ), otherwise some features will not work very > >> >well if tomcat > >> >> is embeded in some other app. > >> >> > >> >> And we should clean up the naming conventions ASAP. We don't need 5 > >> names > >> >> ( server name, service name, engine name, jvmroute and JMX domain ) > - > >> >> all we need is a Servlet Engine ID - common to all of them. > >> > > >> >That sounds reasonable. 4 unique IDs seems overkill. > >> > > >> >Remy > >> > > >> > > >> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > ________________________________________________________________________ > >> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The > >> service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > >> anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > >> http://www.star.net.uk > >> > ________________________________________________________________________ > > > > > >________________________________________________________________________ > >This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The > >service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > >anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > >http://www.star.net.uk > >________________________________________________________________________ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
