Hello, You are receiving this message in follow-up to a report received by the EarthLink Abuse Department. You may have submitted this report to a number of addresses including but not limited to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Most reports of network abuse sent to this department fall into a few recognizable categories (spam, cracking, viruses, etc.). To increase efficiency, our filters scan incoming reports and attempt to determine the general type of issue being reported. We were not able to process your report because it does not appear to include the information needed for EarthLink Abuse to begin it's investigation. Evidence to Abuse should always include the IP address of the offending party and a valid timestamp, which includes time, date and timezone. To learn how to report spam so action is taken: http://spam.abuse.net/userhelp/howtocomplain.shtml To learn how to locate and interpret e-mail headers in your e-mail client: http://support.earthlink.net/support/TUTORIALS/email/mbx_interpret_headers.jsp Other useful lookup tools: http://samspade.org/ Once you have included the pertinent information needed, please resubmit your report, and include this autoresponse. Your report will then be reprocessed by our filters. However, you should expect to receive another auto-response after your resubmission is re-examined, but due to the large number of reports we receive, please understand that you may not receive a personal response. Our policies can be found at the following page: http://earthlink.net/about/policies/ Thanks, The EarthLink Abuse Staff >Marc Slemko wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Henri Gomez wrote: >> >> By describing the problems, I'm hoping that someone who does have the >> time right now can actually make one of the multitude of Apache --> tomcat >> connectors into something production quality without gaping security, >> performance, and stability issues. If not, then it will have to wait >> until I am at a point in my day job where we need to be deploying our >> applications and they need to actually work right and I'll worry about >> it then. >> >> Oh, for whoever is trying to actually make mod_jk work right... you may >> be able to do a "SetHandler jakarta-servlet" inside a Files section >> in a Directory section, not sure if it supports it properly or not, although >> that doesn't let you specify a specific worker. >Nice whine ;-) >If you someday choose to dedicate the same kind of effort on >contributing to TC, I would be very happy (a a lot of people would be >very grateful too) :) >Remy >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
