DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21795 j_security_check isn't fed through filters ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-05 21:13 ------- Container extension methods are not a valid way of extending the model because they are not standardardized but are container specific. What is needed is a means of extending security behaviour without being container specific. Filters could provide one means to do this. The standard itself is not clear on the point of whether filters should work with j_security_check. In the long run the real problem is with the standard. The j_security_check mechanism is awkward and does not adequately address a number of needs. Hopefully, someone will come up with something better soon. In the meantime I am hoping that the servlet committee decides that filters should work with j_security_check so that I can write code that will be portable across containers. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
