Hola a todos: (Many time from my last post, things are settling here, so hope i will contribute some code in future :) shields up, nacho will be messing things shortly, now i'm only moderating our lists, and as some person said time ago "moderation is to coding what washing dishes is to cooking" :))
I know this was discussed before, but i dont really understand why it's needed to have a binary (moreover a win32 binary ) in CVS, and if there isn't a very good reason to do so, i'm against, and if there is a very good reason, i hope i should be applicable to any other binary we produce.. thing that i sincerely doubt .. Saludos, Ignacio J. Ortega > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 9:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin tomcat.exe > tomcatw.exe > > > mturk 2003/10/09 00:19:55 > > Modified: procrun/bin tomcat.exe tomcatw.exe > Log: > Latest binaries (built with VC6/SP5) > > Revision Changes Path > 1.4 +28 -28 > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/tomcat.exe > > <<Binary file>> > > > 1.4 +42 -39 > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/tomcatw.exe > > <<Binary file>> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
