Well, I admit that I don't follow commons-dev as closely as other lists, but
a quick search of Eyebrowse doesn't turn up any such item :).  And I am most
definitely karmically-challenged wrt Commons ;-).

"Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Howdy,

>> I think the following two items should be supported:
>> - I think it should be possible to specify a path to the JVM base
>> directory (this feature is supposed to be present, but doesn't
actually
>> work for reasons I can't remember); using the config dialog to change
>> the JVM path makes the config dialog refuse to start again
>> - when using "java", procrun should look at the JAVA_HOME env
property
>> before looking in the registry, to be consistent with all Java based
>> tools available
>>
>
>If you want to open a commons BZ item for this, I can attach patches
for it
>(I'm not a commons committer, so the round-about is all we've got if
you
>want to go through me :).

Definitely the JAVA_HOME environment is more important for me (I'm a
unix person ;)).

Bill, I thought we took care of making you a commons committer already?
I'm 99% sure I voted +1 on that??  Anyways, if not, I'll nominate you,
and I can commit commons patches (and be a release manager) until then.

Yoav Shapira



This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary
and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to
whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or
used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please
immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the
sender.  Thank you.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to