Graham Leggett wrote:
> 
> > Yes, but why would you wish to separate those?
> 
> Because they are two separate behaviours that could quite 
> easily be used independantly of each other.
>

OK, it makes sense.
 
> 
> > I'm not that familiar with mod_proxy code, so please no 
> hooks, not jet 
> > :)
> 
> I am familiar with the code, so don't be afraid of the hooks, 
> as I'm quite willing to tell you where things go :)
> 

So, where do you see a lb code in the mod_proxy tree. Do you have some ideas
where will it fit?
It would be also good if you could make some p-code of the mod_proxy or some
data flow diagram.

Also do you need our support on coding?
It would be perhaps better that you write the function prototypes that need
some lb behavior returnig somethig like not_implemented or just mark some /*
TODO: ...*/ in the code.

MT.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to