DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30843>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30843 Partition workers2.properties Summary: Partition workers2.properties Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.27 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: Other Component: Native:JK AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, is it possible to partition the workers2.properties for the JK2? We got JK2 running as a ISAPI-Filter on IIS6. Now, the new structure of "workers2.properties" is better against "workers.properties" and "uriworkermap.properties". But now, that we have loads of webs with many contexts each, which itself have 2-5 mappings each, the file get's huge (>40kb) and complex. Is it possible to partition the file, say, with "include={file}" statements? Or better... [include:file] file={file} ver=1 ... this way the the main and subfiles (Mappings, Worker, Channels, ...) remain clear, and even a reload is faster, because the jk2 only needs to read the included files which version-numbers have increased. thanks for your brill work... -- Björn Andersen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]