+0 JK / JK2 are also very specific to our current AJP implemtation.
Maybe they should be called AJP instead ? PS: Happy New Year to all TC-DEV members :) On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:44:17 +0100, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (Note: I'm talking about the Java code here) > > That code is IMO a bit messy. It's fast (it does its job and seems to > beat HTTP for proxying) and works, but I think a cleanup won't hurt. > > Some of the issues: > - Deprecation (ex: JkMain is deprecated, supposedly to be replaced, but > I don't see anything coming, so I think JkMain should be undeprecated) > - Formatting (I don't quite like this, as it would screw up diffs; > running some code formetter on that, like Eclipse, wouldn't hurt, though) > - Many strings refer to "jk2": I plan to replace these with "jk" > > Rémy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
