DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33339>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33339 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-02 12:15 ------- My post to this bug got lost somehow. The code indicates that shutdown of the JK connector is failing in the unlock accept process. This code has been there unchanged (and identical) for years in both JK and HTTP, and hasn't caused any problems. If you're not using JK, you can try disabling it. BTW, don't write statements like "which seems to show there are a lot of threads waiting on an object". This doesn't make any sense, and makes the credibility of the report go down. Stick to reproduceable facts if you are not aware of implementation details. The only thread which matters here is: "main" prio=1 tid=0x0805bda8 nid=0x33b6 runnable [bfffc000..bfffd618] at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(PlainSocketImpl.java:305) - locked <0xabae0260> (a java.net.PlainSocketImpl) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(PlainSocketImpl.java:171) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(PlainSocketImpl.java:158) at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:452) at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:402) at java.net.Socket.<init>(Socket.java:309) at java.net.Socket.<init>(Socket.java:153) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.unLockSocket (ChannelSocket.java:460) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.pause(ChannelSocket.java:272) - locked <0xacb1ee08> (a org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket) at org.apache.jk.server.JkMain.pause(JkMain.java:677) at org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler.pause(JkCoyoteHandler.java:208) at org.apache.catalina.connector.Connector.pause(Connector.java:933) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.stop (StandardService.java:491) - locked <0xabefeca8> (a [Lorg.apache.catalina.connector.Connector;) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.stop (StandardServer.java:717) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.stop(Catalina.java:586) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:561) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(Bootstrap.java:271) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:409) I tested this on Cygwin with startup.sh and shutdown.sh, with the default Tomcat configuration. Honestly, I don't see what it changes. One thing is certain: no developer will install the crappy distro you're using just for the sake of testing this. FC 3 is at least decent ... I will eventually install Tomcat on my Ubuntu. When you file a bug, if developers cannot reproduce it, you need to explain how to reproduce it. If it still fails, or there's no possibility of reproducing, then sorry, there's no other way than try to find where the problem comes from, post to tomcat-user, or use another product if you think the problem is too serious. Given your attitude, I will not miss you ;) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
