DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32257>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32257 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-23 15:08 ------- This decision is very close minded. The specs does not requires any specific extension for JSP pages. Beside, it is a very common practice to use .jspf for page framgment. The Pet Store application (blueprint anyone... recommended practice...) uses the .jspf extension for page fragment (https://bpcatalog.dev.java.net/nonav/webtier/templating/index.html). AFAIK, all web container support any kind of extensions for JSPs. I'm a bit flabergasted as to why a simple modification like that is refused. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
