Well I've no problems with using APR if we could still use a pure Java implementation.
Some may not have APR on their boxes, or an incorrect version of APR, or an invalid APR configuration (ie not multi-threaded). Remember mod_webapp and the reasons why it failed, ie too many peoples couldn't get the correct APR for there machine. So if we could make it configurable, via server.xml for example, using APR seems a great idea. >On 4/14/05, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > Apologies if I missed it, but I've seen responses to Yoav's and Peter's > > posts, > > but I have yet to see anything about Jess' NIO question. Since I agree > > with his > > observations, I was wondering if a reponse was in the works? (I assume > > it'll say > > something like, "Yes, a Java NIO solution could very well provide enough > > improvements, but APR is already written, fully-established, and field- > > tested.") > > > > Just curious. > > In addition to Remy's response, you may want to search the message archives > for this list. We've discussed NIO many times in the past in good depth. > > Yoav > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
