The best way to make sure this bug gets fixed is to file a bug report. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/bugreport.html
Regards, Glenn On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 11:18:28PM -0600, Tom Anderson wrote: > I should have trusted my instincts and not my math. A size_t (32 > bits on most machines) rolls over at 4 GB, not 4 MB... d'oh! So > this falls apart under a decent load, after a day or two in my > case. I guess I'll be going back to the "request" method. For me, > that should last about 1000 days before rolling over. > > I suggest that maybe doubles would be better for the read/write > bytes. Although I still prefer a model that doesn't break at > rollover (reset all counters or moving averages for example). > > On Jun 9, 2005, at 8:13 PM, Tom Anderson wrote: > > >At first I thought maybe it was because transferred, readed (sic) > >and mytraffic are size_t and maybe one of them rolled over. But > >that would rollover at 4MB right? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder | MOREnet System Programming | * if iz ina coment. | Missouri Research and Education Network | */ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
