Hi, Your plan is reasonable and good, +1. We can nag infra and the svn team and hopefully they will improve. But the bottom line is that we have no choice, must migrate to svn by 1/1/2006. We should just pick the date that's best for us...
Yoav Shapira System Design and Management Fellow MIT Sloan School of Management Cambridge, MA [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 3:14 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: New tag ? > > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > It's not really a UI thing for me. One feature I use often are revision > > lists for a particular file, to be able to tell where a bug has been > > introduced (I then do diffs between revisions). It seems with SVN I have > > to retrieve the full revision list for the repository (which will take > > hours). If someone can offer a workaround for this problem, then I'll > > support a move to SVN :) > > I have been doing some quick tests and my totally unscientific, > statistically invalid results are that cvs annotate seems to be about 7 > to 8 times faster than svn blame (50s compared with 7s) and cvs log > seems to be about 2 to 3 times faster than svn log (16s compared to 7s). > > The svn release notes show a number of modifications to improve the > speed of response for a number of commands. The svn team does seem to be > moving things in the right direction. > > I guess the question is can we live with this magnitude performance > drop? It is also worth bearing in mind that there is no sign of any > scope for negotiation in the CVS switch-off date of 1/1/2006. > > I would suggest the following way forward: > 1. Highlight our performance concerns to infra > 2. Request a test migration of something we don't use very much (eg > Watchdog) > 3. Run some tests so we have some more realistic performance figures > 4. Review the results > 5. Decide what to do next once we see the performance results > > If people think this is sensible, I am happy to do 1 to 3 and publish my > results so we can do 4 and 5. > > Thoughts? > > Mark > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
