Hi Mark, I believe the "tomcat_32" branch was the last "clean" build of watchdog for Tomcat 3.2.x and 3.3.x. I always used this branch for testing 3.3.x builds. Some refactoring was begun at HEAD for Tomcat 4.x which was never completed before that work moved to watchdog40.
Larry > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 3:21 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: svn commit: r232600 - > /tomcat/watchdog/branches/tc3.3.x/WARNING.txt > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org> > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 11:00 AM > Subject: Re: svn commit: r232600 - > /tomcat/watchdog/branches/tc3.3.x/WARNING.txt > > > > Mark Thomas wrote: > > > Bill Barker wrote: > > > > > >> As a historical note, this really should be the tc3.2.x branch. > > >> This particular watchdog has never worked well with any > TC 3.3.x, > > >> since it has a lot of bugs related to specific implementation > > >> details of TC 3.2.x (and, the Watchdog committers mostly > moved on > > >> to TC 4.0.x during the Great Flame Wars, so it couldn't > be fixed by > > >> TC 3.3.x committers > :). > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the clarification. I'll change it. That's once of the > > > nice things about subversion - renames (files or directories) are > > > easy and you keep the history. > > > > Bill, > > > > I have taken another look at the repository. There is a separate > > tomcat_32 branch so I assumed that the old HEAD in CVS must > have been > > for 3.3.x (even if not much was done with it). Is this assumption > > correct? If not, what is the correct interpretation? > > > > Actually, I haven't been here that long ;-). Maybe Larry or > Costin can remember why Watchdog was branched. It was pretty > much dead by the time I joined tomcat-dev. All I know is > that it needs quite a few patches to work with TC 3.3.x. > > > As part of the migration to a TLP we will need to put > together our own > > version control and download pages (rather than use the > Jakarta ones). > > I plan to include an explanation of the SVN structure in > the version > > control page. I can include additional information such your note > > above in this explanation. > > > > Cheers, > > > > mark > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) > listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain > information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are > not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or > distribute this message or any attachment. If you received > this communication in error, please notify us immediately by > e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. > > In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) > e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send > confidential or sensitive information, such as social > security numbers, account numbers, personal identification > numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
