DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36293>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36293 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-22 18:57 ------- Remy, I really don't understand what your objection is all about. What is lost by modifying the code to use SoftReferences? Classes can be kept around forever with a minimal memory impact. Caching the underlying resources on the other hand is a totally different matter as they are *much* bigger. I don't think anything is lost by using SoftReferences. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
