DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36540>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36540





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-20 00:11 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> I don't agree with that at all, sticky sessions is a great benefit, but pooled
> synchronized cluster should be working.
> 
> at least it was in the good ol' days :)

No, it never was: the request might be complete from a HTTP standpoint while the
servlet is still running (= the client might send the next request, while the
replication hasn't been done yet). Besides, the spec requires that all
concurrent requests which belong to the same session be processed by the same 
host.

Non sticky sessions is broken for many cases, period. I'll let you close this as
INVALID again.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to