DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-22 23:27 ------- My instinct is that changing the true timestamp of generated files is going to cause other problems. I am very uneasy with a solution that means what a user sees (in terms of timestamps) isn't going to be what actually happened. It is also worth having a look at bug 23406. In that case timing resolutions to the nearest second were not sufficient to resolve the issue. Any patch for this issue should also address the issue in 23406. My preference would be for a patch that recorded, for each JSP, somthing that is guaranteed to change for all of the related use cases. Timestamp + file size should be OK, MD5 certainly would be. My general unease about changing file timestamps hasn't got to the point where I would -1 this patch but I haven't had time to reflect on this yet. In summary: - I agree this is a problem - I agree the right solution isn't going to be easy - I think we need a more robust solution that the current patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
